Home
What We Do - Business Consulting Services
Financial Planning & Analysis Business Consulting Services
Cost Management Consulting Services
Competitive Analysis Consultant
Strategic Planning for Small Businesses
What People Say About Us
News from Rudofsky Associates in New York
Media, Publications & Speaking Engagements
Small Business Advice
FAQ
Consult Rudofsky Associates in New York
Finance for Non-Financial Managers

Udall Proposal Would Make $10 Billion Available for Small Businesses

Senator Mark Udall of Colorado has introduced legislation which would allow Credit Unions to make loans to small businesses up to 27.5% of their assets, compared with the current limit of 12.5 percent, “Bloomberg Business Week” reported.  If adopted, the amendment would make an additional $10 billion available for small business lending, and create up to 108,000 new jobs in the next year, according to Bill Cheney, head of the Credit Union National Association.  If any reader knows why the current limit is 12.5%, please post a comment!

Bookmark and Share
Posted by Rudofsky Associates on August 26, 2010
Tags: , , ,

Introductory Finance for Business

I am scheduled to teach Introductory Finance for Business at The New School 4pm Mondays, starting 8/30/10. The course provides an understanding of financial statements and concepts for students with no prior knowledge of the subject and is enlivened by excerpts from TV and Movies that deal with business finance. We need just a few more students for the course to be a “go”.   (9/27 update:  We got the needed students, and just had our fourth class this evening)

For more details, please click here, and then click on “business and management”, and then click on course NMGT 2133. Please help me pass the word, the course is open to the general public, thanks!

Here are five questions from a practice exam I gave to my students in a prior year; how many of these can you solve?

1. If a company with $3 million annual revenue decreases its accounts receivables from 45 days outstanding to 30 days outstanding how much cash is freed up?

2. An investor buys a 30-year, 10% interest bond, for $100,000. If interest rates increase to 20%, the value of this bond would change to:
a. $50,211
b. $91,667
c. $104,762
d. $176,862

3. Which of the following statements distinguishing debt versus equity is true?

a. Debt is an ownership interest, while equity is not
b. A publicly-owned firm’s equity has a fluctuating market price, not its debt
c. An all-debt firm is more likely to go bankrupt than an all-equity firm
d. Companies must have some debt in place before they can sell equity

4. A firm has operating income of $50 million, interest expense of $18 million, dividends paid of $15 million, and a 40% tax rate, what is net income?
a. $10.2 million
b. $12.8 million
c. $19.2 million
d. $21.0 million

5. A premium bond has a coupon rate that:
a. is less than the yield to maturity.
b. equals zero.
c. must be variable.
d. equals the current yield.
e. exceeds the yield to maturity

ANSWERS: 1. $123,288, 2A, 3C, 4C, 5E

Bookmark and Share
Posted by Rudofsky Associates on August 24, 2010
Tags:

Why Businesses Go Bankrupt: Tribune Company

When Sam Zell completed an $8.2 billion acquisition of the Tribune Company in December 2007 with an equity investment of only $315 million, he was described alternately as “reckless” and a “genius” by the financial press.  Zell’s main strategy was to sell assets and deleverage his position, but plans to sell the Food Network fell through, while plans to sell Wrigley Field and the Chicago Cubs were delayed, and Zell took the Tribune Company (excluding the baseball franchise) into bankruptcy in December of 2008, less than a year after the acquisition closed.

The “Wall Street Journal” reported on 8/3/10 that Houlihan Lokey, a Los Angeles based investment bank, rejected the Tribune Company’s 2007 request for a “solvency opinion” that would have described Zell’s proposed takeover as financially sound. According to WSJ sources, Houlihan Lokey was concerned about the Tribune’s health in particular, and the fortunes of the newspaper industry in general, and felt the deal was “DOA.”  After being snubbed by Houlihan Lokey, the Tribune turned to a smaller firm, Valuation Research, to get the fairness opinion it sought.  A bankruptcy court examiner, Kenneth Klee, recently criticized Valuation Research, saying it “used faulty methods to reach its conclusions.”

On 7/27/10, the Chicago Sun-Times reported that Klee, a Los Angeles attorney and law professor,  had found that Tribune managers did not act forthrightly in procuring the solvency opinion issued by Valuation Research” and that “one of more of Tribune’s officers breached their fiduciary duties.”

Looking at Tribune Company’s 10-Q reports before and after the deal shows that on 3/31/07, they had $3.6 billion of long term debt, and $4.3 billion of shareholders’ equity and on 3/31/08, one year later, long term debt had nearly tripled to $11.6 billion and there was a shareholders’ deficit of ($1.7 billion). It will be fascinating to see  Klee’s detailed comments about the judgment of Tribune’s officers when his 1,000 page report is fully released to the general public.  I’ll also be interested to see if he comments on the judgment of Tribune’s principal lenders: JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup.

Bookmark and Share